Annuity Illustration or Annuity Illusion?: Shootin' It Straight With Stan (TAM Classic)

What’s the difference between an annuity illustration and an illusion? Stan The Annuity Man is here to lay it all out in this Shootin' It Straight With Stan classic. Discover how to spot the differences, understand what's really guaranteed, and avoid any illusions that could cost you.
Watch and Enjoy,
Stan The Annuity Man
Free Annuity Owner’s Manuals
https://www.stantheannuityman.com/get-smarter/annuity-books
Free Annuity Calculators and Live Rate Feeds
https://www.stantheannuityman.com/annuity-calculators
Book a Free 30-minute Call with Stan The Annuity Man
https://www.stantheannuityman.com/book-a-call
ALL THINGS ANNUITIES
https://www.stantheannuityman.com/
LISTEN/WATCH FUN WITH ANNUITIES PODCAST
https://www.youtube.com/@funwithannuities
#StanTheAnnuityMan
#Annuity
#TheAnnuityMan
0:00
Welcome to Shooting It Straight with
0:01
Stan. I'm your host Stan the Annuity
0:03
Man, America's annuity agent, licensed
0:05
in all 50 states. Today's topic is a
0:08
barn burner, as they would say in the
0:11
South. Know where that comes from. I'm
0:14
assuming they're burning barns for
0:15
whatever reason, but this is a barn
0:17
burner. And the topic is annuity
0:20
illustration or annuity
0:22
illusion. Now, right at this point in
0:25
time, at the time of this taping, the
0:27
annuity industry and the life insurance
0:29
industry and life insurance companies
0:31
issue annuities, as you know after
0:33
watching all of my videos, they have
0:36
products that have potential returns
0:40
like index universal life, which I don't
0:42
sell, or index annuities, which I do
0:45
sell, but I properly sell them as
0:46
efficient delivery systems for income
0:48
writer guarantees. And if someone wants
0:50
to look at them for accumulation value,
0:52
they are CD products. Let me repeat
0:54
that. They are CD products. Yes, they
0:56
are CD products. They are not market
0:58
products. They were not put on the
1:00
planet in 1995 when they're first
1:02
introduced for market returns, market
1:04
upside with no downside, market
1:06
participation with with principal
1:08
protection, sir. That crap that's being
1:11
pitched out there. But addition to that
1:15
crap sales [ __ ] which I just did in a
1:18
very good southern kind of low
1:21
IQ
1:23
voice. What they also do is this. Mr.
1:26
Jones, Mrs. Jones, please look at this
1:28
proposal. Please look at these numbers
1:30
that if you'd have owned it 10 years
1:32
ago, if you'd have owned it whatever the
1:36
eight years ago, these are the returns
1:38
that you would have
1:40
made. Okay? You've all seen that. Nod
1:43
your head if you haven't. And you're
1:44
going to be pitched that by somebody and
1:45
they're going to say, "Look at this. If
1:47
you'd have owned it like 10 years ago,
1:49
you'd have made seven, 10, 11, 13, 14,
1:52
six% returns with market with no with
1:55
principal protection. And we're going to
1:57
give you an up upfront bonus,
2:00
too." That is getting ready to be a big
2:03
issue in this industry. Now, I have been
2:05
pounding the table on this
2:08
misleading pie in the sky, unicorn
2:11
chasing the butterflies, too good to be
2:13
true nonsense, targeted at people in
2:16
this country that are not sophisticated
2:20
to understand that that doesn't exist or
2:22
are so sophisticated that they think
2:24
they're so smart that they've got gotten
2:26
something their neighbor doesn't know
2:27
about. Either way, it's it's a problem.
2:31
And now the lawyers and I love lawyers.
2:35
A lot of good my my some of my best
2:37
friends are lawyers. Dave who is one of
2:39
my best friends in the world is a
2:40
lawyer. So I don't have anything against
2:42
lawyers but lawyers are capitalist and
2:44
lawyers smell blood and lawyers are like
2:47
sharks in the water. And lawyers like
2:49
like suing big companies and big inter
2:52
industries with big pockets. Can I get a
2:56
annuity amen and a hallelujah with that?
2:58
We all know that. So, what's been
3:01
happening in the industry and it's not I
3:04
mean kudos to the annuity industry. I
3:06
mean they do not allow a lot of
3:08
information and details to come out
3:10
about this and I'm sure they're going to
3:12
say I really wish Stan would shut up and
3:16
stop talking about this. But I consider
3:18
myself the annuity consumer advocate,
3:20
the annuity whisperer, the top agent in
3:22
the country. And with that role,
3:24
licensed in all 50 states, but with that
3:26
role, it's my
3:28
duty. It's my duty to tell you what's
3:31
going on. So, right now, a lot of states
3:35
don't even allow the back tested
3:36
numbers. Well, sir, if you'd owned it 10
3:38
years ago, look what you would have
3:39
made. And there's a lot of indices,
3:41
indexes, plural is what that is, that
3:44
are made up out of thin air, you know,
3:46
like three months ago, you've never
3:48
heard of it. And then they're going to
3:49
show you they the agent advisor, what
3:52
you would have made 10 years ago if
3:53
you'd owned it, but it's only been
3:55
around three months. Please explain to
3:56
me how that's rational. It's not
3:58
rational. This is an easy fix. The
4:01
annuity industry could do this easily.
4:03
They could fix
4:04
it. If my name was Stannislov, the
4:07
annuity zar, I would fix it. I would not
4:10
allow it. But I think what's getting
4:11
ready to come down the pike because the
4:13
lawyers are sniffing blood. They money
4:16
blood. They have found out that are a
4:19
lot of Americans, hardworking Americans,
4:23
that put a lot of their retirement money
4:25
into a product that they believed was
4:27
going to get them market upside with no
4:29
downside. That they believed was going
4:31
to get them market participation with
4:33
principal protection. That they believed
4:35
they were going to get 9 10 11 13%
4:38
return that they believed the sales
4:40
pitch. That they believe the
4:42
hypotheticals. And oh, by the way, what
4:44
the lawyers have found out, those
4:46
hypotheticals were in writing and were
4:49
on the company issuing an annuity
4:52
company paper. Now, yes, to to the
4:55
annuity company's defense, and I will
4:58
defend them because when they put out
5:00
products, they're not trying to
5:01
bamboozle anyone. But the problem is
5:03
once the agent army gets a hold of it,
5:06
then the annuity company, the annuity
5:08
carrier can't regulate what's being said
5:11
or shown. Now, the way to combat that is
5:13
don't show these hypothetical
5:15
theoretical numbers. And I think after
5:17
this these legal things that are coming
5:19
down the pike,
5:22
um I'm not sure they're going to be
5:24
around too much longer. Thank goodness.
5:26
I've only been pounding the table on
5:28
this for over a decade of please stop
5:30
showing this. Please stop convincing
5:33
people to buy potential. You know, my
5:36
saying is you own an annuity for what it
5:37
will do, not what it might do. When the
5:39
might do are these hypothetical,
5:40
theoretical, projected, backtested
5:43
unicorns chasing the darn butterfly
5:46
proposals that sound too good to be true
5:49
because they are. So, is it an annuity
5:51
illustration or an annuity illusion?
5:53
Most of the time, it's an
5:56
illusion. There's a very smart lady in
5:59
the in the annuity business who I have
6:01
tons of respect for and she focuses on
6:04
the index annuity space. She said a long
6:07
time ago, she's never seen one of those
6:09
proposals come true. She's never seen a
6:12
hypothetical or theoretical illustration
6:14
come true. When I read that from her a
6:17
long time ago, that was it for me cuz
6:20
she's the source. And I was like, "Okay,
6:22
she said it. I'm done. I'm done."
6:25
Because all of this
6:27
stuff makes no sense. I got a call the
6:30
other day and a gentleman's like, "Well,
6:32
you know, Stan, I'm I'm you I'm looking
6:33
at the mas uh because those are
6:35
guaranteed interest rate." Yes, thank
6:37
you. And I'm looking at this index
6:38
annuity that was presented to me, but
6:41
you know, they're telling me I'm getting
6:42
seven n 10%. I'm like, "What's your
6:44
goal?" Well, I'd like to get 9 to 10%. I
6:47
You're I don't want to call you an
6:48
idiot, but you're delusional. You're
6:52
delusional. It's not going to happen.
6:55
And all of the agents and advisers out
6:57
there, please don't send me that that
6:59
thing that your mom owned or you own or
7:01
your brother owns. By the way, if any if
7:04
any agent goes, you know, you really you
7:06
really should buy this because look, my
7:08
mom owns this, my uncle Bob owns this,
7:10
stop. If they're having to sell that to
7:12
their mom and their uncle Bob, they need
7:15
to get out of the business. Period.
7:16
Don't do I mean, for all the agent
7:18
advisors out there, don't do business
7:20
with family. I don't do business with
7:21
family. I don't want to talk to family
7:22
at the family reunion about annuities or
7:25
money. I I want to talk about the the
7:27
deiled eggs and the potato salad,
7:29
mayonnaise based, of course, not musket
7:31
based, if you know what I mean. But the
7:33
point is this. These annuity
7:34
illustrations are really annuity
7:36
illusions in most cases, whether it's
7:38
index universal life, which is pitched
7:40
out there like, well, you can get this
7:42
and you can get and you can get a a
7:44
tax-free income. No, you can't because
7:46
it's a loan on the policy and all loans
7:48
are taxree. Why? Good question. because
7:50
they're loans. Okay, there's a fee for
7:53
the loan. So, I'm getting taxfree
7:55
income. No, you're not. You're getting a
7:56
loan and congratulations on the loan and
7:58
maybe the loan works out, but I'm just
8:00
going to tell you it's not taxfree
8:02
income. So, annuity illustration or
8:05
annuity illusion. See, I believe that
8:09
the annuity industry could really clean
8:10
this up and do themselves a favor from a
8:13
PR standpoint. Again, if I was
8:14
Stannislav, my name was
8:16
Stannislav and I I was annuity zar, I
8:20
would clean this up. I would say, "We're
8:21
not showing back tested numbers. We're
8:23
not going to show all of that." You
8:25
know, listen, the world would be perfect
8:27
if we could all go back and make
8:29
decisions back in the day knowing the
8:31
answers like Back to the Future Part Two
8:34
when the when the the bully guy had the
8:36
had the the book of all the scores and
8:38
he was making money as a gambler. Watch
8:40
it. I love Back to the Future. Anyway,
8:42
Michael J. Fox. But the point is I
8:46
mean if the annuity industry with index
8:49
universal life and indexed annuities and
8:52
buffer annuities whatever would say we
8:55
cannot show we cannot show back tested
8:58
numbers but here here are the cap
9:00
spreads and participation rates. And by
9:02
the way for all of you out there those
9:04
are the levers that limit the upside
9:07
that the annuity company controls and
9:09
can change and gives you multiple
9:11
choices. And at the time of this taping,
9:13
there's over
9:15
700 index annuity index option choices.
9:21
700. How about that? Now, spoiler alert,
9:25
they're all they're all pretty much
9:26
designed to give you the same type of
9:27
return. And when index annuities were
9:29
put on the planet in 1995, they were to
9:31
compete with
9:33
CDs. CD returns, not market returns.
9:37
Okay? And if you attach an income writer
9:39
to an index annuity, then that fee for
9:41
the income writer is going to be
9:42
deducted from the accumulation value.
9:46
But if the annuity industry would just
9:48
disallow the back tested numbers and
9:51
just show I mean this is this is basic
9:54
just show okay here's the cap spread
9:56
participation rates for this first year.
9:59
here's the carrier's renewal rate
10:01
history because they can change the
10:02
rules but here's how they performed and
10:04
have they pulled the contractual rug out
10:06
from other people show that and then
10:09
have the people go well you know there's
10:10
a 7% cap this year um and historically
10:14
it's it's you know they have been fair
10:16
to the client then make your decision
10:18
there but don't don't make your decision
10:21
on the illustration because it's an
10:25
illusion I really wish the annuity
10:27
industry would beat the lawyers to the
10:29
punch on this. It would be the best PR
10:32
ever if they came out as an industry and
10:35
said the National Association of
10:37
Insurance Commissioners, who I love
10:39
those people, I I think they need to be
10:41
proactive. They need to hold their press
10:42
conference and say, "We have looked at
10:44
these back tested numbers. We have
10:45
looked at the hypotheticals,
10:46
theoreticals, and unicorns chasing the
10:48
butterflies stuff out there, and no more
10:50
is that allowed. You cannot show that as
10:53
an agent. And if you do, you will lose
10:55
your license immediately and be fined
10:57
$10,000. that would solve it. Period.
11:00
And then you would base your decision on
11:02
what's in place contractually moving
11:04
forward and and the the way that the
11:06
annuity company changes those um caps
11:09
and spreads, their historical nature on
11:11
that. That's not a back tested. That's
11:13
that's saying, have they been fair to
11:15
the to the client? Have they been fair
11:17
to the policy holder? Because I always
11:19
say with let's just say you have a
11:20
one-year call option on an index annuity
11:22
and the surrender charge is a 10-year
11:24
surrender charge. What in essence you're
11:26
buying is a one-year guarantee with a
11:28
10-year surrender charge because years
11:29
two through 10, the annuity company at
11:32
their discretion can change the rules on
11:34
the caps and the spreads and the
11:35
participation rates. Yes, there are a
11:37
handful that don't at this point in
11:40
time, but still you need to do your
11:43
homework on that. Do not believe the
11:46
sales pitch. Now, we can solve this a
11:48
couple ways in the industry. It's going
11:50
to get solved either way. This will be
11:53
solved this in the future. The back
11:55
tested numbers. My prediction is Stan
11:57
the Annuity Man, America's annuity
11:58
agent, licensed in all 50 states, the
12:01
brutal factual truth ta teller, walking
12:04
middle finger of annuity truth out here.
12:08
I know. I love that. Someone called me
12:09
that when they introduced me one time
12:11
and I've I've hung on to that. Here's
12:13
the point though. I think eventually
12:14
it's going to go away. Either the
12:16
lawyers are going to force that through
12:18
a class action lawsuit or or the annuity
12:22
industry is going to be proactive and
12:24
say no more. We're not doing that. From
12:26
a PR standpoint, we're not going to do
12:28
that. We're not going to mislead in any
12:30
way the public. Now, again, the carriers
12:33
aren't trying to mislead, but the way
12:35
it's being presented is misleading.
12:37
Okay? I'm on I'm on the carrier side
12:39
here. The agents are the one that's
12:41
taking the message and just ramping it
12:43
up. You know, you know this this this
12:45
Ford Pinto will go 140 miles an hour,
12:47
sir. I'm I'm just telling you. 0 to 50
12:49
in 0 to 60 in two seconds. I mean, it's
12:52
that kind of sales pitch, but it's going
12:54
to get solved. It's either going to get
12:55
solved by the lawyers or it's going to
12:58
get solved by the industry. Now, here's
13:00
the twist to the whole thing, which is
13:02
insanity. When I read this, and I'm not
13:05
going to mention any names, and you can
13:07
dig it if you want to, but you know,
13:08
I've got I've got no beef against
13:10
anybody. I'm standing nudity. kind of a
13:11
lovable, huggable figure out here. Warm
13:13
fuzzball, right? Okay. Didn't Rush say
13:16
that? Like harmless fuzzball. Rush
13:18
Limbbo long time. I believe me, I'm not
13:20
a Rush Limbaugh fan. But he was
13:21
talented. We all have to, you know,
13:24
agree with that. I mean, was I was a
13:26
fan. I was a fan of his talent. How
13:27
about that? I just I'm just not
13:29
political. I don't, you know, I don't
13:30
care either way. I'm just a capitalist
13:32
who tries to play guitar. As you can see
13:35
in the background, they got four four
13:37
flying V's. But what was I talking
13:41
about? Yeah, I was talking about the
13:42
industry. Oh, the the the the twist.
13:44
Here's the twist. And here, this is
13:47
great. There are some agents that are
13:50
now suing the
13:52
carriers that gave them the prop the
13:55
hypothetical and theoretical proposals
13:57
to show to their clients. They're
13:59
saying, "Well, they should have never
14:00
they should have never provided that
14:01
hypothetical for me to voluntarily
14:04
show." Okay. Um, I think I'm gonna sue
14:09
um Crispy Cream Donuts for for the gut.
14:13
That's like me saying, you know, Crispy
14:15
Cream, put that in front of me. And
14:17
that's just not fair. And they shouldn't
14:19
do that because they know I'm from the
14:20
South and they know I suffer from the
14:22
sugars. Sugars, you know,
14:26
sugi-diabetes for all you people from
14:28
not from the South. And I'm going to sue
14:30
Crispy Cream Donuts because of that.
14:32
That's the stupidity of what I'm
14:34
reading. agents suing the carriers
14:37
because they were given this and then
14:40
they presented it because and now
14:42
they're suing the carriers because the
14:43
carriers gave it to them. H that's a
14:46
weird one. I mean that's that's that's
14:49
the best legal pivot I've ever seen in
14:51
my life. But here's the bottom line and
14:54
the takeaway. Do not put any faith,
14:58
credence, or credibility in any
15:01
backtested number that's shown to you.
15:04
any number of Mr. Jones, you to own it
15:06
10 years ago, you would have got this.
15:09
Why wouldn't you own it for the next 10
15:11
years because of those past 10 years? If
15:14
that's you, you are dumb as a box of
15:17
hair. You're stupid and you get what you
15:19
deserve and you if you've bought it
15:22
under that premise, you made a mistake.
15:24
And if you can get out, get
15:27
out. Period. I know that's harsh, but
15:30
all those back tested numbers don't come
15:32
true ever.
15:37
You know, I'm working on my breathing to
15:38
get my blood pressure down. But this
15:40
topic, annuity illustration or annuity
15:44
illusion, yeah, I had to wear the red
15:46
standing annuity man cap for a reason to
15:48
match my face, which is beat red because
15:53
this one drives me crazy because
15:56
consumers are making big-time mistakes
15:58
based upon these misleading
16:02
representations. Be careful out there.
16:05
Watch the news. This is going to get
16:08
interesting. And stay safe. Stay happy.
16:11
Stay healthy. Stay positive. And stay
16:14
tuned in to shooting it straight with
16:15
Stan. I'm Stan the annuity man. I'll see
16:18
you next week.
Talk to Stan The Annuity Man® himself
Get Stan for 30 minutes. No cost for his 3 decades of experience. Prepare yourself for the brutal annuity truth.


